Recently, I saw someone
explaining showing as deep POV, which it isn't. The example was:
She saw a truck drive by
the house.
Deep POV is: a truck drove
past the house.
That's not deep POV.
That's the difference between showing and telling.
Deep POV is writing from inside
the character's head, making the reader privy to his or her thoughts. What it
isn't, or in my mind shouldn't be is long internal monologues. I prefer action,
which is probably why I'm not a fan of literary fiction.
Now before y'all tar and
feather me, let me say I love parts of literary fiction. I love a literary turn
of a phrase and will read some to study it. But I don't read literary for
pleasure.
Back to the action.
Pulling an excerpt from my sophomore novel, Chapel Springs Survival, my main
character, Claire, and her husband, Joel, have just found out her nineteen year
old son, Wes, has married a 21st Century mail order bride...from
Brazil. One who is eight years older than he. This is the exchange.
Joel squatted next to her. "Are you okay?"
She'd never be okay. Not now. Wes dropped to his
knees in front of her.
"Mom,
I'm sorry. I ... I don't know what to say. I didn't want to tell you until
Costy was here and you got to meet her."
Costy? Claire groaned. She didn't want to meet her. What kind of name was
that anyway? Costly was probably more
like it. "Does this girl even speak English?"
"Uh-uh, not yet."
Her son married someone he couldn't even talk to?
You've been
privy to Claire's thoughts without me using "she thought" or
"she wondered." Those tags take the scene out of deep POV, while still remaining
in the character's POV.
That said, sometimes, I use thought or wondered. When? When it sounds better. As with all elements of
fiction, there are times to employ them and times to hire a temp and change it
up.
So, how do you
feel about deep POV? I know some people hate it and some love it. What about you?
While a large, floppy straw hat is her favorite, Ane Mulligan has worn many: hairdresser, legislative affairs director
(that's a fancy name for a lobbyist), drama director, playwright, humor
columnist, and novelist - all providing a plethora of fodder
for her Southern-fried fiction. She firmly believes coffee and chocolate are
two of the four major food groups. Ane resides in Suwanee, GA, with her artist husband, her
chef son, and two dogs of Biblical proportion. You can find Ane on her Southern-fried Fiction website, Google+, Facebook, Goodreads, Twitter, and Pinterest.
Oh, Ane. You know me. I absolutely ADORE deep POV. And you nailed it, too!
ReplyDeletexo
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Julie. It's funny, that's how I've almost always written, at least since my second manuscript. lol That first one was a learning adventure.
ReplyDeleteAne,
ReplyDeleteA great post. Thank you!
I'm not a big fan of deep POV. I don't really care what the characters are thinking.
I am a big fan of George MacDonald, a Scottish author from the 1800s. He wrote omniscient POV to perfection and his storytelling speaks to my soul.
Thanks again for a great post!
Carrie, the old novelists did omniscient very well. I love that his storytelling speaks to you soul. :)
ReplyDeleteDeep POV is the way to go. I'm a BELIEVER!
ReplyDeleteJ.A. Marx
Thanks, JA. I love deep POV. I love to experience the story with the characters when I read.
ReplyDeleteGood post, Ane. I'm a great fan of deep POV, and I use mostly shorter things like you do, but occasionally, because of some event, I do use more deep POV.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Lena. And I've used longer internal monologue at times, too. It all depends on what the story dictates. :)
ReplyDelete